Firefighter Nation

Firefighting & Rescue Social / Professional Network

New! Visit FireEMSblogs.com for Hot Content - 40,000+ Members - Invite Friends - Watch Emergency! - Not a Member? Join Now
At my departments open house we had a 1977 impala to cut up. and it required more effort to cut than we thought.

Share/Send to Friends & Co-Workers

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Actually, the old body-on-frame cars are not all that hard to cut if you're familiar with how they're built.

You can't assume that everything will just crumple out of the way for a spreader the way it does on a unibody.
The body-on-frame cars are much more resistant to spreading forces if the force is distributed end-to-end.
That requires better spreader angles for door attacks.

The massive C-posts are easy to cut...if you don't rely on hydraulic cutters. There are at least 3 good alternative tactics:

1) Don't cut the C-post, just flap the roof in front of the C-post.
2) Use a sawzall to cut the C-post
3) Use an air chisel to make a window in the C-post, which will result in two small C-posts. Then you can just snip the remaining metal with your hydraulic cutters.

A-Posts and B-posts are pretty easy to cut, as long as you avoid the reinforced shoulder harness hanger area in the B-posts.

You don't have to worry about fortified steel components other than seat belt components as a general rule.
There are no air bags, SIPS protection, or seat belt pre-tensioners in cars this old.

You may have to worry about the 5 MPH bumper cylinders being loaded after a crash; this isn't a problem with modern cars, as the cylinders have been replaced with rubber or styrofoam cells.

The battery systems are almost always simple and in the engine compartment.

There is usually more interior room to work on the patients.

The dashboards are easy to lift with a hydraulic spreader with the arms turned vertically.

If you have gone away from dash rolls with hydraulic rams, consider bringing this technique back for these older cars.

Fuel systems may not have the vapor recovery systems, so fires are a bigger threat.

This isn't every consideration, but these are a start.

Reply to This

RSS

Sign in

E-mail

Password
 or Sign Up
By signing in, you agree to the amended Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Forgotten your password?

Latest Nation Member Activity

18 minutes ago
Way to go Ladd.
42 minutes ago
I would have to go with C. Ted brought up some very valid points.
42 minutes ago
44 minutes ago

FFN eMail Alerts

Get hot content from FFN and FireRescue
FireRescue eNewsletter
Breaking & Daily News
Special Promotions
Webcast/Content Alerts
*Your eMail Address:

© 2009   Created by Firefighter Nation WebChief, an Elsevier Public Safety & Go Forward Media, LLC Product -   Partners: JEMS Connect - FireRescue - JEMS
Contact Us: Report an Issue, Inquire About Advertising & Partnerships
This site is intended for use by current and former fire, rescue & EMS professionals. Non emergency service personnel may be subject to review and removal. Using this site inappropriately to spam/advertise or solicit members in any way will result in account termination. Commercial companies may have profiles, but blogs, forums, videos and photos may not be used for self-promotion.

Badges  |  Contact Firefighter Nation  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service